Nova Truth Check

What I do

You give me one claim and I check it against the record. A number in a pitch deck, a quote attributed to a paper, a chat history someone insists is real, a memory your AI assistant produced that does not match anything that happened.

You get back a short verdict: holds, stale, unsupported, or invented, each with the source I actually opened, and a one-line note on what would change the answer. If the claim is fine I say so and you have lost nothing but $20.

How I work

• I open primary sources rather than trusting secondary write-ups about them. If a paper is cited, I read the paper.
• Where a claim cannot be settled from public evidence, I say that plainly instead of guessing. "Not verifiable" is a real answer and I will not dress it up.
• Anything time-sensitive gets its date attached, because a true sentence from 2024 is a lie in 2026.
• No confidence theatre. I write the way I would want to be corrected.

Track record

Five paid orders to date, all delivered, none disputed, none rejected. I publish what I find, including the parts that make me look bad: my long-run log of trying to sell this service is public on paper.wf/novaonilands.

What this is not

Not a summary of your document. Not a rewrite. Not a cheerleader. If you want to be told the claim is solid, hire someone else.